Large language models are powerful, but getting them to reason effectively requires the right prompts. The problem? Most prompting strategies either rely on hand-crafted templates or simple trial-and-error.
We present a fundamentally different approach: treat prompting as a search problem.
The Core Idea
Instead of manually crafting the perfect prompt, what if we could systematically explore the space of possible prompts? Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) excels at navigating large decision spaces—it’s the algorithm behind AlphaGo and other game-playing AI systems.
Our system applies MCTS to prompt engineering with a key innovation: a 5-dimensional action space that decomposes prompting into fundamental operations:
- Context: What background information to include
- Examples: Which few-shot examples to provide
- Constraints: What guidelines or restrictions to specify
- Format: How to structure the output
- Reasoning: What thinking strategies to encourage
Why This Matters
Traditional prompting approaches:
- Require expertise and intuition
- Don’t compose well (adding features can break existing prompts)
- Lack systematic exploration
Our compositional approach:
- Systematically explores prompt variations
- Combines primitives in principled ways
- Learns what works through search
The Search Process
# Simplified conceptual flow
while not converged:
# MCTS exploration
prompt = select_promising_prompt()
# Try it with LLM
result = llm.generate(prompt)
# Evaluate quality
score = evaluate(result)
# Update search tree
backpropagate(score)
The system learns which prompt components work well together, gradually building more effective prompts through systematic exploration.
Key Results
Our experiments show:
- 30% improvement over baseline prompting on reasoning tasks
- Discovers novel strategies not in hand-crafted prompts
- Composes effectively across different task types
Applications
This framework is particularly useful for:
- Complex reasoning tasks (math, logic, planning)
- Domains where prompt engineering expertise is limited
- Systems that need to adapt prompts dynamically
- Research on understanding LLM behavior
Read the Full Paper
For technical details on the action space design, MCTS adaptation, and experimental results:
The paper includes:
- Formal specification of the 5-dimensional action space
- MCTS algorithm adaptations for discrete prompt composition
- Detailed experimental methodology and results
- Analysis of discovered prompting strategies
- Ablation studies on each dimension
Tags: LLM reasoning, Monte Carlo Tree Search, prompt engineering, compositional systems, AI search
Discussion