Why AlgebraicHashing?¶
The Problem with Traditional Hash Functions¶
Traditional hash function libraries treat hashing as a utility - a means to an end. You call a function, get a number back, and move on. While functional, this approach has several limitations:
1. Limited Composability¶
Want to combine two hash functions for extra strength? You're writing boilerplate:
// Traditional approach
uint64_t hash_combine(const std::string& data) {
uint64_t h1 = fnv1a_64(data);
uint32_t h2 = fnv1a_32(data);
return h1 ^ static_cast<uint64_t>(h2);
}
Every composition requires a new function. Need a different combination? Write another function. Need to experiment with various compositions? Prepare for lots of boilerplate.
2. No Type Safety¶
// Easy to make mistakes
uint64_t h1 = some_hash(data1);
uint32_t h2 = other_hash(data2);
auto combined = h1 ^ h2; // Implicit conversion - is this what you wanted?
The type system doesn't help you. Hash values are just integers, and the compiler can't tell if you're combining them correctly.
3. Rigid Implementation¶
// Want to experiment with different hash combinations?
// Need to modify and recompile each time
#define USE_STRONG_HASH 1
#if USE_STRONG_HASH
return fnv64(data) ^ murmur(data);
#else
return fnv64(data);
#endif
Changing your hashing strategy means editing code and recompiling. There's no way to build hash functions dynamically from smaller pieces.
4. Educational Limitations¶
When teaching hash functions, you want to demonstrate:
- How different hash functions behave
- How composition affects distribution
- The algebraic properties of hashing
But with traditional libraries, students are stuck with opaque function calls. The mathematical beauty is hidden behind imperative code.
The AlgebraicHashing Solution¶
AlgebraicHashing treats hash functions as first-class algebraic objects that you can compose, transform, and reason about mathematically.
1. Elegant Composition¶
using namespace algebraic_hashing;
// Define once, use anywhere
auto strong_hash = fnv64{} ^ fnv32{};
// Compose further
auto extra_strong = strong_hash * ~fnv64{};
// Use just like any hash function
auto result = extra_strong(data);
Hash functions become building blocks. Composition is natural and expressive.
2. Compile-Time Type Safety¶
template<Hashable T>
auto secure_hash(const T& data) {
auto h = fnv64{} ^ fnv32{};
return h(data); // Type-checked at compile-time
}
// This won't compile - NonHashable doesn't satisfy Hashable concept
// secure_hash(NonHashable{});
C++20 concepts ensure correctness. If it compiles, it's type-safe.
3. Flexible Architecture¶
// Build hash functions dynamically
auto make_hash(int strength) {
if (strength == 1) return fnv64{};
if (strength == 2) return fnv64{} ^ fnv32{};
return repeat(fnv64{} ^ fnv32{}, strength);
}
// All resolved at compile-time with template instantiation
auto hash = make_hash(3);
Change your hashing strategy without recompiling. Experiment freely.
4. Educational Value¶
// Demonstrate hash properties visually
auto h1 = fnv64{};
auto h2 = ~h1; // Complement
// Show that XOR is commutative
static_assert(std::same_as<decltype(h1 ^ h2), decltype(h2 ^ h1)>);
// Analyze behavior
std::cout << "Avalanche effect: " << h1.measure_avalanche_effect(data) << "\n";
std::cout << "Distribution quality: " << h1.measure_distribution_quality(dataset) << "\n";
Students can see and experiment with hash function properties.
The Mathematical Foundation¶
Hash Functions as Algebraic Structures¶
In mathematics, hash functions have beautiful properties:
Group Structure (under XOR):
- Identity: h ^ zero_hash = h
- Inverse: h ^ h = zero_hash
- Associativity: (h1 ^ h2) ^ h3 = h1 ^ (h2 ^ h3)
- Commutativity: h1 ^ h2 = h2 ^ h1
AlgebraicHashing makes these properties executable code:
auto h1 = fnv64{};
auto h2 = fnv32{};
auto h3 = fnv64{};
// Mathematical properties become code
auto identity = h1 ^ hash_value<8>::zero(); // Returns h1
auto inverse = h1 ^ h1; // Returns zero hash
auto associative = (h1 ^ h2) ^ h3; // Same as h1 ^ (h2 ^ h3)
Why This Matters¶
- Correctness: Mathematical laws guarantee correct behavior
- Composability: Algebraic properties enable safe composition
- Reasoning: You can reason about combined hash functions mathematically
- Optimization: Compiler can use algebraic laws for optimization
Real-World Impact¶
For Application Developers¶
// Before: Scattered hashing logic
class UserCache {
uint64_t compute_key(const User& user) {
auto h1 = std::hash<std::string>{}(user.name);
auto h2 = std::hash<int>{}(user.id);
return h1 ^ (h2 << 32); // Hope this is good enough
}
};
// After: Clear, type-safe, composable
class UserCache {
static constexpr auto key_hash = fnv64{} ^ fnv32{};
auto compute_key(const User& user) {
return key_hash(user); // Type-safe, tested, validated
}
};
For Researchers¶
// Experiment with novel compositions
auto experiment_1 = fnv64{} ^ murmur3{};
auto experiment_2 = repeat(fnv64{}, 3) ^ murmur3{};
auto experiment_3 = parallel(fnv64{}, fnv32{});
// Benchmark them
benchmark_distribution(experiment_1, dataset);
benchmark_distribution(experiment_2, dataset);
benchmark_distribution(experiment_3, dataset);
For Educators¶
// Show students hash function internals
class StudentFriendlyHash : public hash_function_base<StudentFriendlyHash, hash64> {
hash64 hash_impl(const auto& data) const {
// Step-by-step, visible implementation
hash64 result = initial_value;
for (auto byte : get_bytes(data)) {
result ^= byte; // XOR step
result *= prime; // Multiplication step
}
return result;
}
};
// Students can modify, experiment, learn
auto student_hash = StudentFriendlyHash{};
auto composition = student_hash ^ fnv64{};
When to Use AlgebraicHashing¶
✅ Perfect For¶
- Applications needing flexible hash composition
- Educational settings teaching hash functions or modern C++
- Research into hash function properties
- Systems requiring type-safe hashing
- Projects valuing expressive, maintainable code
🤔 Consider Alternatives If¶
- You need a simple, standard hash (just use
std::hash) - You're on a C++17 or older compiler (needs C++20)
- You need cryptographic hashes (use a crypto library like OpenSSL)
- You want the absolute minimum binary size (header-only = more code in binary)
The Vision¶
AlgebraicHashing demonstrates that infrastructure libraries can be both practical and beautiful. Hash functions don't have to be opaque utilities - they can be:
- Mathematical objects you can reason about
- Composable components you can build with
- Educational tools you can learn from
- Research platforms you can experiment on
All while maintaining zero-cost abstractions and production-ready quality.
Ready to explore the concepts further?